Franois Quesnay (1985) privileges the social wealth (value of use) in detriment of the capitalist accumulation (value of exchange), questioning ' ' society of ter' ' (consumerism) for ' ' society of ser' '. In synthesis, the fisiocratas in the long run searched the conditions of a reproduction of the social life, presenting one low concern with the process of capitalist accumulation. The analysis of the estimated ones that they guide this conception of sustainable development allows understanding in them that, in the logic of the self-sufficiency and the auto-regulation, the relation work and environment point with respect to the subsuno of the work to the nature and ' ' of the individual to the community, becoming it a mere function social' ' (MAZZOTTI, 1998). Finally, one third conception of sustainable development has as perspective ' ' support democrtica' ' , ' ' understood as the process for which the societies manage the conditions material of its reproduction, redefining the ethical and sociopolticos principles that guide the distribution of its resources ambientais' ' (ACSELRAD, 2001; LEROY, 1999). It considers a change of the hegemonic paradigm of economic development, on the basis of principles of social justice, overcoming of socioeconmica inaquality anchored democratic construction in the dynamism of the social actors. It brings the quarrel of the support for the field of the social relations, analyzing the social forms of appropriation and use of the resources and the environment. It understands that the slight knowledge of support and sustainable development are social constructions fruit of the shock politician enter some actors in search of hegemony of its position. In this perspective, the market leaves of being a privileged actor of the development and the economicista vision of a model that privileges the economic growth disrespecting the finite character of the natural resources, also yields place to a perspective of democratic development, that if carries through in the partition of the social wealth and in the distribution of the control on the resources, proceeding from the nature, explicitando the matrix politician of this appropriation.
-
Pages
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- November 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- June 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- November 2010
Categories